Pages
Special Features
Categories
- Archaeology
- Art
- Asia
- Book Fair
- Cantonese Opera
- Chit Chat
- Conference
- Culture
- Education
- exhibition
- Festival
- Field trip
- Film
- Folk Art
- food
- Heritage
- History
- Kunqu
- Literature
- Missionary
- Music
- Peking Opera
- photography
- Podcast
- poetry
- Publication
- Research
- Seminar
- Teaching
- Translation
- Uncategorized
Archives
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
Meta
October 29, 2008
It often takes a while to ponder over how to read China in the globalised context. More often than not any discussion on this is often either confined to how distinctive and special China’s past was, or how western’s ideas and practices have brought about sweeping changes to China. But Professor Bing Wong, director of UCLA Asia Institute and Professor of History, argued for locating China in world history in order to better consider how and why the study of China’s past matters to understanding its present conditions and future possibilities. His arguments might sound provocative to some, yet perhaps one can also draw inspiration from his remarks.
Written by: hiuylee
It is often hard to find a definition for the word “identity”, perhaps it is especially so for many Hong Kong people who often seem to be caught in the middle whenever their identity is to be described. The perennial question on whether Hong Kong people treat themselves as Hong Kongers or Chinese ever since the 1997 handover, though, probably appears a bit hard to comprehend for many. Indeed, I often look at these categorisation with suspicion. Can one’s search for, or feelings of, one’s cultural identity be so easily described? The answer perhaps lies on culture. And I do believe singularity should not be the name of the day when it comes to cultural identity. For, culture is often in the making, on the move, and one which never be isolated from not only the society in which it was born but also other communities which came to interact with it. There is no need to arbitrarily impose an identity on a person. Rather, one should be willing to appreciate not only their own cultural traditions but also that of the others.
Written by: hiuylee
A decade has been passed since the Chinese Civilisation Centre (CCIV) was established at the City University of Hong Kong in 1998. For some, the term “Chinese Civilisation” may be an anti-thesis to modernity. Yet a deeper pondering over the issue will easily lead to different interpretations. For any civilization and culture to continue evolving and growing, there will always interaction with outside influences, and even challenges. It is a continuous process – the present and the future simply cannot be separated from the past. Thus, it is the goal of the centre to bring the treasures and values of Chinese civilization not only to the knowledge of our students but also for international appreciation as well. It is against this backdrop that this blog is launched. We believe in the importance of the exchange of thoughts should knowledge be developed and new ideas be inspired. It is hoped that this blog could act as a channel through which not only discussion of any topic of interest be enhanced but our cultural activities can also reach out to a wider audience.
Written by: hiuylee



